Compare and contrast the 2 Websites

The differences between the 2 that i found was in Front page you had to start with a blank page. This also took a lot longer to construct because you physically had to go in and add any tables and place them where you wanted them. Adjust cell spacing, padding etc. Add pictures,text and links to other pages and create each new page to your web site. This is why for building a web site in Front page, it is a good idea to have a storyboard done before hand so you know exactly where everything goes and get an idea of what its going to look like.
Using the web 2.0 site i was able to complete my site 1,2,3. I was done in half the time it took me to build it in Front page. I was just able to go in and pick a template that already had the design built for you. I looked for the template that fit the best with my storyboard. The templates were fairly close but something might of been located a little different then from the initial story board. After that just pretty much click on the area i wanted to have something and copy what ever it was i wanted there. And it created the other pages of the site within a second. I notice the one thing that was different was in Web 2.0 you could add a photo gallery in a matter of just uploading the photos and as many as you wanted.
The only adjustments that i had to make on the Web 2.0 was my header was left aligned and my buttons were righted aligned beside the header. But pretty much everything else was were it was placed on my storyboard. And there was a few things added on like your email address and a copy of the header underneath. The only problem i had and still can't fix it is the header for each page. Everytime i change the header for one page, all the pages have that exact header, instead of the header i created for that page. I had fun.